关于推荐人

About Recommender

麓湖艺术浮桥设计师

A8泡泡屋设计师

张赫天

张赫天建筑事务所主持建筑师

都上层建构建筑设计研究院执行董事、总建筑师

张赫天零三年赴法留学，期间在巴黎贝尔维尔国家高等建筑学院获建筑硕士学位、城市规划及城市设计硕士学位。曾就职伯纳德·屈米建筑师事务所及弗朗西斯·霍建筑师事务所，并同时在巴黎创办“中法建筑交流学会”从事建筑学术交流活动。一零年回国后先后创立了unarchitecte（张赫天建筑师事务所）、cutscapearchitecture（研造社）及superstructure（上层建构）三所建筑设计机构。

事务所项目发表于国内外权威建筑网站（Domus, Detail, Dezeen, ArchDaily, Gooood, Designboom, Architizer, etc.）及刊物（C3, WA, CA, TA, UED, BOB, etc. ）; 并在德国和国内多地参展；在美国获评为一四年中国七个最佳建筑之一；荣获第五届中国营造奖，首届建筑新传媒奖，意大利那不勒斯国际经典文化建筑奖、意大利国际卓越设计奖、一九年欧洲ARCHMARATHON Selections @MADE EXPO建筑大奖教育类第一名等。

Zhang Hetian went to study in France in 2003, during which he obtained a master's degree in architecture and a master's degree in urban planning and urban design from École nationale supérieure d'architecture de Paris-Belleville. He once worked in Bernard Tschumi Architects and Francis Huo Architects, and at the same time founded the "Sino-French Architectural Exchange Society" in Paris to engage in architectural academic exchange activities. After returning to China in 2010, he successively established three architectural design institutions: unarchitecte, cutscapearchitecture and superstructure.

The firm's projects are published on authoritative architectural websites at home and abroad (Domus, detail, dezeen, archdaily, gooood, designboom, architizer, etc.) and publications (C3, WA, CA, Ta, ued, Bob, etc.). And participated in many exhibitions in Germany and China. In the United States, it was rated as one of the seven best buildings in China in 2014. Won the Fifth China Construction Award, the first New Media Award for architecture, the international classic cultural architecture award in Naples, the international excellent design award in Italy, and the first prize in education of the European ARCHMARATHON Selections @MADE EXPO Architecture Award in 2019.

01

走向新建筑

勒·柯布西耶

简介 

Description

勒·柯布西埃在建筑理论上提出了许多革新和独特的见解，批评了看不到工业发展和建筑发展必然趋势的古典主义学派，对世界现代建筑的形成和发展产生了很大影响。在本书中提出了建筑必须走大生产、工业化道路，反对搞虚假装饰的古典主义；主张设计要有整体观念等等。

Le Corbusier put forward many innovative and unique insights in architectural theory, criticized the classicism school that did not see the inevitable trend of industrial development and architectural development, and had a great influence on the formation and development of modern architecture in the world. In this book, it is proposed that architecture must take the road of mass production and industrialization, and oppose the classicism of false decoration, advocate that the design should have an overall concept and so on.

推荐理由

Reason for Recommendation 

这本书从美学精神、设计方法、分析批判、社会与时代等方面表达了柯布，这位伟大建筑师和思想家犀利且不容置疑的对现代建筑的定义，精确而富有诗意，质朴但富有精神，是游戏，也是革命。

This book expresses Corbusier, the great architect and thinker's sharp and indisputable definition of modern architecture from the aspects of aesthetic spirit, design method, analysis and criticism, society and times. It is precise and poetic, simple but spiritual. It is a game and a revolution.

02

简介 

Description

《空间·时间·建筑》一书具有以下特点：用比较方法来研究历史；用空间概念来分析建筑；用恒与变（Constance and Change）来揭示发展的本质；用大历史衬托具体建筑现象，又用具体现象的深刻分析来呼应时代；种种直笔与曲笔的结合，共时与历时分析的结合使人在雄浑的历史感中体会到建筑真意。内容上时段起始文艺复兴直至当代，范围跨越规划、建筑，所用材料丰富翔实、富于启发，实际上它不止检讨建筑和规划各方面与工业技术的并行发展与相互影响，还呈现了它们与艺术结伴而行的情形。此外在它之前许多建筑与规划不为人知，而经它之后为人重视的现象比比皆是，所以对史料所作的重新诠释之功也是不可忽视的。

This book has the following characteristics: using comparative methods to study history; Using the concept of space to analyze architecture; Reveal the essence of development with Constance and change; Setting off specific architectural phenomena with great history and echoing the times with profound analysis of specific phenomena; The combination of all kinds of straight pen and Qu pen(distortion of the facts by an official historian), and the combination of synchronic and diachronic analysis make people realize the true meaning of architecture in a vigorous sense of history. In terms of content, the period began from the Renaissance to the contemporary, covering planning and architecture. The materials used are rich, detailed and enlightening. In fact, it not only reviews the parallel development and interaction between all aspects of architecture and planning and industrial technology, but also presents the situation that they go hand in hand with art. In addition, many buildings and plans were unknown before it, and there are many phenomena that people pay attention to after it, so the contribution of reinterpretation of historical materials can not be ignored.

推荐理由

Reason for Recommendation 

吉迪恩由文艺复兴、巴洛克、十九世纪向现代顺延，结合各阶段科学、技术和材料的进步，历史性地讨论现代建筑与城市空间的发展，并提出建筑道德标准，扛起早期激进正统的现代建筑理论旗帜，大力地推动了现代主义建筑运动。

Extended from the Renaissance, Baroque and 19th century to modern, combined with the progress of science, technology and materials at various stages, Giedion historically discussed the development of modern architecture and urban space, put forward architectural moral standards, shouldered the banner of early radical and orthodox modern architectural theory, and vigorously promoted the modernist architectural movement.

03

透明性

柯林·罗

简介 

Description

柯林·罗和罗伯特·斯拉茨基在得克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校共同发起了建筑学团体“得州游侠”，参与者还有约翰·海杜克（John Hejduk）、沃纳·塞利格曼（Werner Seligmann）和伯纳德·霍伊斯里。与他们的教学事业相联系，这个团体的成员寻求一种新的建筑学设计方法，并将他们的理论模型通过教学实践来检验。他们的方针建立在作为现代时期、现代建筑客观基础的知识结构之上，最后在名为《透明性：物理层面与现象层面》的文章中达到顶峰，这篇文章系统阐述了他们的理论原则。

Colin Rowe and Robert Slutzky co-founded the architecture group "Texas Rangers" at the University of Texas at Austin. Participants included John Hejduk and Werner Seligmann and Bernard Hoisley. In connection with their teaching career, members of this group sought a new architectural design method and tested their theoretical model through teaching practice. Their policy is based on the knowledge structure that serves as the objective basis for modern architecture in the modern era, and finally reached the culmination in the article titled "Transparency: Physical and Phenomenon", which systematically expounds their theoretical principles.

推荐理由

Reason for Recommendation

无论物理的还是现象的透明性，都是在表达当判断和处理空间边界时，所需要具备的感性与理性的逻辑，如对位、穿越、渗透、冲突、平衡，交叠、延伸、持续、模糊等等，由此而动态形成的建筑空间产生耐人回味的秩序与乐趣。小到家具大至城市空间都是如此。

Whether physical or phenomenal transparency, it expresses the perceptual and rational logic that needs to be possessed when judging and processing spatial boundaries, such as counterpoint, crossing, penetration, conflict, balance, overlap, extension, continuity, Fuzziness and so on, the resulting dynamically formed architectural space produces a memorable order and fun. This is true from small furniture to large urban spaces.

04

建筑的矛盾性与复杂性

罗伯特·文丘里

简介 

Description

《建筑的复杂性与矛盾性》是文丘里很有影响的一部建筑理论著作。作者认为，建筑具有不足性，出色的建筑作品必然是矛盾的和复杂的，而不是非此即彼的纯净的或简单的。意义的丰盛胜于简明，甚至杂乱而有活力胜于明显的统一。密斯有一句名言“少就是多”，文丘里却认为“多并不是少”。

This book is an influential architectural theory work by Venturi. The author believes that architecture is inadequate, and outstanding architectural works must be contradictory and complex, rather than pure or simple. The abundance of meaning is better than conciseness, and even messy and dynamic is better than obvious unity. Mies has a famous saying "less is more", but Venturi believes that "more is not less."

推荐理由 

Reason for Recommendation 

认为时代反复不定的文丘里在批判现代主义规则的同时指出，后现代的有效的简化，相对于少即是多，更为理智自由、丰富多样，因而极力追求功能和精神以外更多的东西：建筑和城市中灵动有力的尺度，矛盾的空间的适度并存，非传统地运用传统，复杂而矛盾的生机勃勃的新体系。

Venturi, who believes that the times are indeterminate, criticized the rules of modernism and pointed out that the effective simplification of postmodernism is more intellectually free, rich and diverse than less is more, and therefore strives to pursue more things beyond function and spirit: The flexible and powerful scale in architecture and the city, the moderate coexistence of contradictory spaces, the non-traditional use of tradition, the complex and contradictory vibrant new system.

05

现代建筑的形式基础

彼得·埃森曼

简介

Description

本书为彼得·埃森曼的博士论文。通过从内部向普适性理念提出质疑，埃森曼的论文揭露了现代建筑的根本性困局(aporia)，进而迫使读者不汲汲于浅显易得的内容，而开始把关注点从图像化的建筑外观向下深入，深读建筑。像阅读文本一样阅读建筑，哪怕是不可避免地伴随着龃龉与支吾、繁复与缺漏、理屈与词穷，这无疑是在概念上和智识上批判性地破旧立新的第一步。埃森曼和罗的隐微对话贯穿于他的博士论文全篇，来往之间，他逐渐找到了一个远离核心的位置。就此而论，我们虽然在传统上被认为是西方建筑学的局外人，但也正因如此，反而受惠于旁观者的身份而有望施展同等水准的批判力量——不仅仅从西方建筑学的外部，更是在中国建筑学的内部。埃森曼在知识论断裂的破晓写就此文，而此时此刻的我们也身负同等紧迫的任务。有鉴于此，今天的我们在阅读本书的时候，必应背负着一种责任感。

This book is the doctoral dissertation of Peter Eisenman. By questioning the concept of universality from the inside, Eisenman’s paper exposes the fundamental dilemma of modern architecture (aporia), which in turn forces readers to avoid the simple and easy-to-obtain content, and start to focus on the image instead. The exterior of the building goes deep down, reading architecture deeply. Reading architecture like reading a text, even if it is inevitably accompanied by discord and hesitation, complexity and omissions, reasoning and poor words, this is undoubtedly the first step in conceptually and intellectually critically breaking down the old and creating the new. The subtle dialogue between Eisenman and Luo runs through the whole of his doctoral dissertation, and between the exchanges, he gradually found a position far away from the core. In this regard, although we are traditionally regarded as outsiders of Western architecture, but because of this, we benefit from the identity of the bystander and are expected to exert the same level of critical power-not only from the outside of Western architecture. , It is also in the interior of Chinese architecture. Eisenman wrote this article on the break of epistemology, and at this moment we also have an equally urgent task. In view of this, when we read this book today, we must bears a sense of responsibility.

推荐理由 

Reason for Recommendation 

这部著后四十余年才得以发表的艾森曼的博士论文，基于结构主义和后结构主义思想探究和预示，昭示了现代主义文化褪落危机中的重构与新建筑理论的到来，在人文和形式的角力中解析与批判、理解并架构建筑学的根本问题，奠基了形式之间不可还原的逻辑关系的原理。

This Eisenman's doctoral dissertation, which was published more than 40 years later, is based on the exploration and prediction of structuralism and post-structuralism, and shows the reconstruction of modernist culture in the crisis of fading and the arrival of new architectural theory. Analyzing and criticizing, understanding and constructing the fundamental issues of architecture in the struggle between humanity and form, laid the foundation for the principle of the irreducible logical relationship between forms.

06

城市建筑学

阿尔多·罗西

简介

Description

罗西在本书中对现代建筑运动进行了重新评价，同时也分析了城市建设的规则和形式。罗西并不着重于评论乏味的建筑形式，或是摒弃现代建筑中的标准形象，而是如其书名那样，突出讨论了作为“人们集合记忆”宝库的城市所遭受的忽视和破坏。

In this book, Rossi re-evaluated the modern architectural movement, and at the same time analyzed the rules and forms of urban construction. Rossi does not focus on boring architectural forms or rejecting standard images in modern architecture, but, as in the title of his book, highlights the neglect and destruction of the city as a treasure house of "collective memories of people".

推荐理由

Reason for Recommendation 

罗西引入了地理学中的城市形态学、心理学、类型学、社会生态学等诸多学科的研究成果，作为切入他所提出的建筑及城市问题的方法，往复类比，积极引发对城市复杂性和不可预见性的思考。

Rossi introduced the research results of urban morphology, psychology, typology, social ecology and many other disciplines in geography. As a method to cut into the architectural and urban problems he proposed, he repeated analogy and actively induced the urban complexity and unpredictable thinking.

07

癫狂的纽约

雷姆·库哈斯

简介 

Description

《癫狂的纽约》一书中，库哈斯认为“曼哈顿的建筑是一种拥塞的开拓之范型，曼哈顿已产生自己的大都会都市主义――拥塞文化”，并提出了拥塞文化的三个定理：格子（Grid）、脑前叶切开术（lobotomy）、分裂（schism）。格子代表曼哈顿的都市规划，表现出一种不自由和自由间的辩证关系；脑前叶切开术代表摩天大楼内外关系的决裂；分裂则代表摩天大楼叠豆腐式的空间构成造成上下楼层关系分裂的状况。库哈斯认为拥塞文化“解决了形式（外）与机能（内）长久以来的冲突，使曼哈顿的的建筑物兼具建筑和高效能机械；现代的和永恒的。”

In this book, Koolhaas believes that "Manhattan architecture is a model of congestion development, and Manhattan has produced its own metropolitan urbanism congestion culture", and puts forward three theorems of congestion culture: grid, lobotomy and schism. Lattice represents Manhattan's urban planning, showing a dialectical relationship between non freedom and freedom; Anterior lobectomy represents the rupture of internal and external relations of skyscrapers; The split represents the split relationship between the upper and lower floors caused by the overlapping spatial composition of skyscrapers. Koolhaas believes that congestion culture "solves the long-standing conflict between form (external) and function (internal), and makes Manhattan buildings have both architecture and high-efficiency machinery; Modern and eternal. "

推荐理由

Reason for Recommendation

以绝对理性的方法达到了非理性目的，持续偶发的现实欲望成为了曼哈顿生长的原动力。在平面网格中对竖向高度和多样性的追求，造就了拥塞文化的源头，同时却演变成全世界城市发展野心的现实模型。

The irrational purpose is achieved by the absolute rational method, and the continuous and occasional realistic desire has become the driving force for the growth of Manhattan. The pursuit of vertical height and diversity in the plane grid has created the source of congestion culture, but it has evolved into a realistic model of urban development ambition all over the world.

08

肌肤之目

尤哈尼·帕拉斯玛

简介 

Description

对每一位初次习读尤哈尼·帕拉斯玛经典文章的学生来说，《肌肤之目》是一种启示，它具说服力地为建筑文化提供全然崭新的见解。这些文字将帕拉斯玛的个人传记与建筑思考的概要相结合，后者包括其起源，与北欧及欧洲古今思想的关系。这篇文章关注的重点是帕拉斯玛从根本上对待建筑人性、深刻、敏感的态度，并使读者了解他。这些配图来自帕拉斯玛的草图和他自己的摄影。

For every student who first studied the classic articles of Juhani Pallasmaa, The Eyes of the Skin is a kind of enlightenment, which convincingly provides a completely new insight into architectural culture. These texts combine Pallasmaa's biography with a summary of architectural thinking, including its origin and its relationship with ancient and modern ideas in northern Europe and Europe. This article focuses on Pallasmaa's fundamental, profound and sensitive attitude towards architecture, and makes readers understand him. These pictures come from Pallasmaa's sketches and his own photography.

推荐理由

Reason for Recommendation

对待建筑和城市，与生活一样，帕拉斯玛认为人们需要感觉和想象力去获取完整且有尊严的认知，而仅通过视知觉无法感知存在的深刻与精神的回应，同时建筑也会强化我们的自我敏锐，我们探究对声音、光影、材质、动势、人性、时间、文化的多重感知，使肌肤有目，思想有手。

Treating architecture and the city, like life, Pallasmaa believes that people need sense and imagination to obtain a complete and dignified cognition, but only through visual perception cannot perceive the deep and spiritual response of existence, and architecture will also strengthen our self-knowledge, we explore multiple perceptions of sound, light and shadow, texture, momentum, human nature, time, and culture, so that our skin has eyesight and our thoughts have hands.